enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct

    Guest authorship (where there is stated authorship in the absence of involvement, also known as gift authorship) and ghost authorship (where the real author is not listed as an author) are commonly regarded as forms of research misconduct. In some cases coauthors of faked research have been accused of inappropriate behavior or research ...

  3. Irreducible complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity

    Irreducible complexity (IC) is the argument that certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts were removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional. [1]

  4. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published...

    Leek summarized the key points of agreement as: when talking about the science-wise false discovery rate one has to bring data; there are different frameworks for estimating the science-wise false discovery rate; and "it is pretty unlikely that most published research is false", but that probably varies by one's definition of "most" and "false".

  5. List of scientific misconduct incidents - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific...

    In Denmark, scientific misconduct is defined as "intention[al] negligence leading to fabrication of the scientific message or a false credit or emphasis given to a scientist", and in Sweden as "intention[al] distortion of the research process by fabrication of data, text, hypothesis, or methods from another researcher's manuscript form or ...

  6. False attribution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_attribution

    False attribution may refer to: Misattribution in general, when a quotation or work is accidentally, traditionally, or based on bad information attributed to the wrong person or group A specific fallacy where an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased, or fabricated source in support of an argument.

  7. Research ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_ethics

    Research ethics is a discipline within the study of applied ethics. Its scope ranges from general scientific integrity and misconduct to the treatment of human and animal subjects. The social responsibilities of scientists and researchers are not traditionally included and are less well defined. [1] The discipline is most developed in medical ...

  8. AOL

    login.aol.com/?lang=fr-FR&intl=fr

    x. AOL fonctionne mieux avec les dernières versions des navigateurs. Vous utilisez un navigateur obsolète ou non pris en charge, et certaines fonctionnalités de AOL risquent de ne pas fonctionner correctement.

  9. File:Ioannidis (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ioannidis_(2005)_Why...

    attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  1. Related searches false attribution of authorship in research study methods quizlet biology

    why are published research papers falsewhy are most research papers false