enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of cryptographic hash functions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of...

    The RIPE Consortium [1] MD4: RIPEMD-128 RIPEMD-256 RIPEMD-160 RIPEMD-320: 1996 Hans Dobbertin Antoon Bosselaers Bart Preneel: RIPEMD: Website Specification: SHA-0: 1993 NSA: SHA-0: SHA-1: 1995 SHA-0: Specification: SHA-256 SHA-384 SHA-512: 2002 SHA-224: 2004 SHA-3 (Keccak) 2008 Guido Bertoni Joan Daemen Michaël Peeters Gilles Van Assche ...

  3. Secure Hash Algorithms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithms

    Cryptographic weaknesses were discovered in SHA-1, and the standard was no longer approved for most cryptographic uses after 2010. SHA-2: A family of two similar hash functions, with different block sizes, known as SHA-256 and SHA-512. They differ in the word size; SHA-256 uses 32-bit words where SHA-512 uses 64-bit words. There are also ...

  4. Comparison of cryptography libraries - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptography...

    SHA-1 SHA-2 SHA-3 RIPEMD-160 Tiger Whirlpool BLAKE2 GOST R 34.11-94 [45] (aka GOST 34.311-95) GOST R 34.11-2012 (Stribog) [46] SM3; Botan: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Bouncy Castle: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes BSAFE Crypto-J Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No cryptlib: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No ...

  5. Cryptographic hash function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function

    SHA-2 basically consists of two hash algorithms: SHA-256 and SHA-512. SHA-224 is a variant of SHA-256 with different starting values and truncated output. SHA-384 and the lesser-known SHA-512/224 and SHA-512/256 are all variants of SHA-512. SHA-512 is more secure than SHA-256 and is commonly faster than SHA-256 on 64-bit machines such as AMD64.

  6. Public key fingerprint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_key_fingerprint

    As of 2017, collisions but not preimages can be found in MD5 and SHA-1. The future is therefore likely to bring increasing use of newer hash functions such as SHA-256 . However, fingerprints based on SHA-256 and other hash functions with long output lengths are more likely to be truncated than (relatively short) MD5 or SHA-1 fingerprints.

  7. Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS...

    The revision DTLS 1.2 based on TLS 1.2 was published in January 2012. [33] TLS 1.3 (2018) specified in RFC 8446 includes major optimizations and security improvements. QUIC (2021) specified in RFC 9000 and DTLS 1.3 (2022) specified in RFC 9147 builds on TLS 1.3. The publishing of TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3 obsoleted TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2.

  8. SHA-2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2

    SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions designed by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and first published in 2001. [3] [4] They are built using the Merkle–Damgård construction, from a one-way compression function itself built using the Davies–Meyer structure from a specialized block cipher.

  9. Length extension attack - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack

    Algorithms like MD5, SHA-1 and most of SHA-2 that are based on the Merkle–Damgård construction are susceptible to this kind of attack. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Truncated versions of SHA-2, including SHA-384 and SHA-512/256 are not susceptible, [ 4 ] nor is the SHA-3 algorithm. [ 5 ]