enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free. [2] FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses. There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the Free Software Definition.

  3. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    SLUC is a software license published in Spain in December 2006 to allow all but military use. The writers of the license maintain it is free software, but the Free Software Foundation says it is not free because it infringes the so-called "zero freedom" of the GPL, that is, the freedom to use the software for any purpose. [77]

  4. Free Software Foundation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Foundation

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded by Richard Stallman [6] on October 4, 1985. The organisation supports the free software movement, with the organization's preference for software being distributed under copyleft ("share alike") terms, [7] such as with its own GNU General Public License. [8]

  5. Free software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software

    The FSF list is not prescriptive: free-software licenses can exist that the FSF has not heard about, or considered important enough to write about. So it is possible for a license to be free and not in the FSF list. The OSI list only lists licenses that have been submitted, considered and approved.

  6. GNU General Public License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License

    Sometimes this approach has made it possible for important programs to become free software". Although the FSF does not practice selling exceptions, a comparison with the X11 license (which is a non-copyleft free software license) is proposed for suggesting that this commercialization technique should be regarded as ethically acceptable.

  7. Software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_license

    Diagram of software under various licenses according to the FSF and their The Free Software Definition: on the left side "free software", on the right side "proprietary software". On both sides, and therefore mostly orthogonal, "free download" . A software license is a legal instrument governing the use or redistribution of software.

  8. Free and open-source software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software

    "Free and open-source software" (FOSS) is an umbrella term for software that is considered free software and/or open-source software. [1] The precise definition of the terms "free software" and "open-source software" applies them to any software distributed under terms that allow users to use, modify, and redistribute said software in any manner they see fit, without requiring that they pay ...

  9. GNU Lesser General Public License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public...

    The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary) software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components.