enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  3. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. 120 (2012), also known as Sackett I (to distinguish it from the 2023 case), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act. [1]

  4. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency may refer to either of two United States Supreme Court cases: Environmental Protection Agency (2012) (alternatively called Sackett I ), 570 U.S. 205 (2013), a case in which the Court ruled that orders issued by the EPA under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act .

  5. Feds sue Idaho ranch, allege ranchers dumped dirt in river ...

    www.aol.com/feds-sue-idaho-ranch-allege...

    Sackett v. EPA, which was about a North Idaho family who moved gravel on property they owned to build a home, severely limited the EPA’s authority to regulate waterways in the U.S. The ...

  6. If bulkhead construction followed state and local procedures ...

    www.aol.com/bulkhead-construction-followed-state...

    The illegality of relying on such temporary flooding had already been decided by the unanimous Supreme Court decision (Sackett v. EPA 2023 that simply reaffirmed Rapanos v U.S. 2006) and is ...

  7. NC cut its wetlands rules. Now millions of acres may be ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/nc-cut-wetlands-rules-now-083000115.html

    Just weeks before the Republican-controlled General Assembly passed the Farm Act over Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto, the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA narrowed the definition of wetlands covered ...

  8. 'A race to the bottom': Indiana wetlands bill could affect ...

    www.aol.com/race-bottom-indiana-wetlands-bill...

    Millions of acres of wetlands across the country lost protections that existed under the Clean Water Act after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year left it up to states to decide the extent of ...

  9. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Planning_and...

    The EPA's guide provides a useful description of the four groups of chemicals subject to reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Extremely Hazardous Substances : This list currently contains more than 300 chemicals. Because of their extremely toxic properties, these chemicals were chosen to provide an initial ...