enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court Can Protect Property Owners From Eminent ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-protect-property...

    The U.S. Supreme Court invited such abuses with its 2005 ruling in Kelo v. City of New London , which blessed the use of eminent domain to promote economic development by transferring property ...

  3. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  4. Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knick_v._Township_of_Scott...

    Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, No. 17-647, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with compensation for private property owners when the use of that property is taken from them by state or local governments, under the Due Process Clause and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  5. Law of Massachusetts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Massachusetts

    The legal system is based on common law, which is interpreted by case law through the decisions of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, and the Appellate Divisions of the Massachusetts District Court and the Boston Municipal Court departments, which are published in the Massachusetts Reports, Massachusetts ...

  6. Opinion: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling treats ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-massachusetts-supreme...

    The state's high court now says individuals 18 to 20 years of age at the time they committed murder cannot be sentenced to life without parole. Opinion: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling ...

  7. Supreme Court rules owners of seized cars are not entitled to ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-innocent...

    The Supreme Court refused on Thursday to give innocent owners of seized cars a right to an immediate hearing to reclaim their vehicles. Instead, the justices in a 6-3 decision said the ...

  8. Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Supreme...

    The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court traces its history back to the high court of the British Province of Massachusetts Bay, which was chartered in 1692.Under the terms of that charter, Governor Sir William Phips established the Superior Court of Judicature as the province's local court of last resort (some of the court's decisions could be appealed to courts in England).

  9. Judiciary of Massachusetts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Massachusetts

    The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is the court of last resort. An appeal from a conviction of first degree murder goes directly to the Supreme Judicial Court. The Supreme Judicial Court can also elect to bypass review by the Appeals Court and hear a case on "direct appellate review."