Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
De Morgan's laws represented with Venn diagrams.In each case, the resultant set is the set of all points in any shade of blue. In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [1] [2] [3] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [4] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference.
(i.e. an involution that additionally satisfies De Morgan's laws) In a De Morgan algebra, the laws ¬x ∨ x = 1 (law of the excluded middle), and; ¬x ∧ x = 0 (law of noncontradiction) do not always hold. In the presence of the De Morgan laws, either law implies the other, and an algebra which satisfies them becomes a Boolean algebra.
The result is the same as if we shaded that region which is both outside the x circle and outside the y circle, i.e. the conjunction of their exteriors, which is what the left hand side of the law describes. The second De Morgan's law, (¬x) ∨ (¬y) = ¬(x ∧ y), works the same way with the two diagrams interchanged.
To investigate the left distributivity of set subtraction over unions or intersections, consider how the sets involved in (both of) De Morgan's laws are all related: () = = () always holds (the equalities on the left and right are De Morgan's laws) but equality is not guaranteed in general (that is, the containment might be strict).
De Morgan's laws: In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [15] [16] [17] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [18] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference. They are named after Augustus De Morgan, a 19th-century British mathematician.
Example. It rains and the sun shines implies that there is a rainbow. Thus, if it rains, then the sun shines implies that there is a rainbow. ... De Morgan's law, and ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
For example, LC is known not to prove all theorems of SmL, but it does not directly compare in strength to BD 2. Likewise, e.g., KP does not compare to SL. The list of equalities for each logic is by no means exhaustive either. For example, as with WPEM and De Morgan's law, several forms of DGP using conjunction may be expressed.