Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This geometric argument relies on definitions of arc length and area, which act as assumptions, so it is rather a condition imposed in construction of trigonometric functions than a provable property. [2] For the sine function, we can handle other values. If θ > π /2, then θ > 1. But sin θ ≤ 1 (because of the Pythagorean identity), so sin ...
Just as the points (cos t, sin t) form a circle with a unit radius, the points (cosh t, sinh t) form the right half of the unit hyperbola. Also, similarly to how the derivatives of sin(t) and cos(t) are cos(t) and –sin(t) respectively, the derivatives of sinh(t) and cosh(t) are cosh(t) and +sinh(t) respectively.
The fact that the triple-angle formula for sine and cosine only involves powers of a single function allows one to relate the geometric problem of a compass and straightedge construction of angle trisection to the algebraic problem of solving a cubic equation, which allows one to prove that trisection is in general impossible using the given tools.
Then exchange all the cosine and sine terms to cosh and sinh terms. However, for all products or implied products of two sine terms replace it with the negative product of two sinh terms. This is because − i sin ( i x ) {\displaystyle -i\sin(ix)} is equivalent to sinh ( x ) {\displaystyle \sinh(x)} , so when multiplied to together the ...
Circles about the points (0,0), (0,1), (0,2) and (0,3) of radius 3.5 in the Lobachevsky hyperbolic coordinates. Construct a Cartesian-like coordinate system as follows. Choose a line (the x -axis) in the hyperbolic plane (with a standardized curvature of -1) and label the points on it by their distance from an origin ( x =0) point on the x ...
Since cosh x + sinh x = e x, an analog to de Moivre's formula also applies to the hyperbolic trigonometry. For all integers n, ( + ) = + . If n is a rational number (but not necessarily an integer), then cosh nx + sinh nx will be one of the values of (cosh x + sinh x) n. [4]
The angle opposite the leg of length 1 (this angle can be labeled φ = π/2 − θ) has cotangent equal to the length of the other leg, and cosecant equal to the length of the hypotenuse. In that way, this trigonometric identity involving the cotangent and the cosecant also follows from the Pythagorean theorem.
If P 0 is taken to be the point (1, 1), P 1 the point (x 1, 1/x 1), and P 2 the point (x 2, 1/x 2), then the parallel condition requires that Q be the point (x 1 x 2, 1/x 1 1/x 2). It thus makes sense to define the hyperbolic angle from P 0 to an arbitrary point on the curve as a logarithmic function of the point's value of x. [1] [2]