Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 1958, Martin Luther King Jr. sent one copy of his newly published book, Stride Toward Freedom, to Chief Justice Earl Warren, writing on the first free end page: [213] [214] "To: Justice Earl Warren. In appreciation for your genuine good-will, your great humanitarian concern, and your unswerving devotion to the sublime principles of our ...
The Warren Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren served as the chief justice. The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in U.S. history. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.
"I know [obscenity] when I see it[.]" – Justice Potter Stewart Quantity of Books v. Kansas: 378 U.S. 205 (1964) Seizure of allegedly obscene materials requires prior adversary hearing Bell v. Maryland: 378 U.S. 226 (1964) segregation protests Bouie v. City of Columbia: 378 U.S. 347 (1964) due process and ex post facto law: United States v ...
Chief Justice Earl Warren, the author of the Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in Loving v. Virginia. On June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 decision in favor of the Lovings. The Court's opinion was written by chief justice Earl Warren, and all the justices joined it. [b]
The dark side of Earl Warren's past is his advocacy of Japanese incarceration during World War II. Skip to main content. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 ...
In a majority opinion joined by five other justices, Chief Justice Earl Warren ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to establish state legislative electoral districts roughly equal in population. Warren held that "legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not ...
The Supreme Court reversed. The decision, written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, cited Perez v. Brownell.In Perez the Court had held that citizenship could be divested in the exercise of the foreign affairs power.
Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote for the majority. [2] Warren noted that it is an offense for a witness to refuse to answer any question "pertinent to the question under inquiry" in testifying before a Congressional committee, but he wrote that the Court was unable to ascertain the nature of the Congressional inquiry with reasonable precision: