Ad
related to: nemo dat exam non exam bo
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Nemo dat quod non habet, literally meaning "no one can give what they do not have", is a legal rule, sometimes called the nemo dat rule, that states that the purchase of a possession from someone who has no ownership right to it also denies the purchaser any ownership title.
nemo dat quod non habet: no one gives what he does not have: Thus, "none can pass better title than they have" nemo est supra legem (or leges) nobody is above the law (or laws) Nemo igitur vir magnus sine aliquo adflatu divino umquam fuit: No great man ever existed who did not enjoy some portion of divine inspiration
Nemo debet esse iudex in propria "No one shall be a judge in his own case." In the past it was thought that it included just two rules, namely (1) nemo iudex in causa sua (no one shall be a judge in his own case). Nemo ius ignoratur censetur "Not knowing the law is harmful." Everyone should know the law.
bis dat qui cito dat: he gives twice, who gives promptly: A gift given without hesitation is as good as two gifts. bis in die (bid) twice in a day: Medical shorthand for "twice a day" bona fide: in good faith: In other words, "well-intentioned", "fairly". In modern contexts, often has connotations of "genuinely" or "sincerely".
de minimis non curat lex: The law does not care about the smallest things. A court does not care about small, trivial things. A case must have some importance in order for a court to hear it. See "de minimis non curat praetor". Also used as an adjective: "The court found that the alleged conduct was de minimis." de minimis non curat praetor
Nemo dat quod non habet. But it is the fact that the agreement is a lease which creates the proprietary interest. It is putting the cart before the horse to say that whether the agreement is a lease depends upon whether it creates a proprietary interest... For these reasons I would allow the appeal and declare that Mr. Bruton was a tenant.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Reduced to its simplest terms, the ruling of both these cases is an application of the philosophic maxim, 'nemo dat quod non habet,' i.e., the court in both cases ruled that because the testator had no depreciable interest in a building subject to a long term lease until after the termination of the lease, his devisees could not, by reason of ...
Ad
related to: nemo dat exam non exam bo