enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_Discrimination_Act

    The major argument in most cases that lost in court was that providing benefits for pregnant workers gave women more benefits than men had, as pregnancy can not occur within a male body. [14] This therefore shut down the cases being tried under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution , as it requires "Equal Protection".

  3. Pregnancy discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_discrimination

    Pregnancy discrimination may also take the form of denying reasonable accommodations to workers based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [2] Pregnancy discrimination has also been examined to have an indirect relationship with the decline of a mother's physical and mental health. [3]

  4. Pregnant Workers Fairness Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnant_Workers_Fairness_Act

    The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is a United States law meant to eliminate discrimination and ensure workplace accommodations for workers with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. [1] It applies to employers having fifteen or more employees. [2]

  5. Employers must give their workers time off for an abortion or ...

    www.aol.com/employers-must-workers-time-off...

    Most employers must offer “reasonable accommodations” to workers related to pregnancy or childbirth, including providing time off for an abortion, according to a final rule issued Monday by ...

  6. New rules for Pregnant Workers Fairness Act include divisive ...

    www.aol.com/news/rules-pregnant-workers-fairness...

    Workers are entitled to time off and other job accommodations for abortions — along with pregnancy-related medical conditions like miscarriage, stillbirth and lactation — under the Pregnant ...

  7. United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Automobile_Workers...

    United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. , 499 U.S. 187 (1991), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that private sector policies prohibiting women from knowingly working in potentially hazardous occupations are discriminatory and in violation of Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 ...

  8. Employment discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination

    Because high concentrations of women work in these fields (34.8% of employed women of color and 5.1% of white women as private household workers, 21.6% and 13.8% working in service jobs, 9.3% and 3.7% as agricultural workers, and 8.1% and 17.2% as administrative workers), "nearly 45% of all employed women, then, appear to have been exempt from ...

  9. Biden vetoes bid to repeal US labor board rule on contract ...

    www.aol.com/news/biden-vetoes-bid-repeal-us...

    President Joe Biden followed through on Friday on his vow to veto a Republican-backed measure that would have repealed a U.S. labor board rule treating companies as the employers of many of their ...