Ads
related to: breathalyzer in court
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Dissent. Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Kagan. Dissent. Gorsuch. Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant."
A breathalyzer or breathalyser (a portmanteau of breath and analyzer/analyser), also called an alcohol meter, is a device for measuring breath alcohol content (BrAC). It is commonly utilized by law enforcement officers whenever they initiate traffic stops.
Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. 438 (2016) is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the search incident to arrest doctrine permits law enforcement to conduct warrantless breath tests but not blood tests on suspected drunk drivers. [1]
Pao Hang, 37, originally faced charges of OWI-7, failure to install an ignition interlock device and seventh offense operating with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration.
General and cited sources. Drunk driving in the United States. Drunk driving is the act of operating a motor vehicle with the operator's ability to do so impaired as a result of alcohol consumption, or with a blood alcohol level in excess of the legal limit. [ 1 ] For drivers 21 years or older, driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC ...
Justin Timberlake refused to take a breathalyzer test before his recent arrest on DWI-related charges. As Us Weekly previously confirmed, Timberlake, 43, was taken into custody on Tuesday, June 17 ...
Ads
related to: breathalyzer in court