Ads
related to: michigan ex parte order template form downloadlegal-pleading-template.pdffiller.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
A Must Have in your Arsenal - cmscritic
- Type Text in PDF Online
Upload & Type on PDF Files Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Write Text in PDF Online
Upload & Write on PDF Forms Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Edit PDF Documents Online
Upload & Edit any PDF File Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- pdfFiller Account Log In
Easily Sign Up or Login to Your
pdfFiller Account. Try Now!
- Type Text in PDF Online
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5–4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same were unconstitutional.
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that the use of military tribunals to try civilians when civil courts are operating is unconstitutional.
In law, ex parte (/ ɛ k s ˈ p ɑːr t eɪ,-iː /) is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction [1] of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". An ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
A subpoena duces tecum (pronounced in English / s ə ˈ p iː n ə ˌ dj uː s iː z ˈ t iː k ə m / sə-PEE-nə DEW-seez TEE-kəm), or subpoena for production of evidence, is a court summons ordering the recipient to appear before the court and produce documents or other tangible evidence for use at a hearing or trial.
TCA 40-32-101(a)(5) All public records concerning an order of protection [ex-parte, exparte] authorized by title 36, chapter 3, part 6, which was successfully defended and denied by the court following a hearing conducted pursuant to § 36-3-605, shall, upon petition by that person to the court denying the order, be removed and destroyed ...