Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For instance, after the whole hiring process is accomplished, the conspiring employers may say they need more time to decide and never give any decision, or after the whole hiring process is completed, the conspiring employer would state the false reason for not hiring victim candidates. It is similar to price-fixing. This type of fraud is very ...
The memo also suggested giving sedentary Walmart staffers, such as cashiers, more physically demanding tasks, such as "cart-gathering", and eliminating full-time positions in favor of hiring part-time employees who would be ineligible for the more expensive health insurance and several policy proposals which may violate the Americans with ...
Earlier in 2017, the same year the tax scam passed, Iowa Republicans stripped collective bargaining rights away from public employees in Iowa, limiting our ability to negotiate for our safety in ...
The commission also mediates and settles thousands of discrimination complaints each year prior to their investigation. The EEOC is also empowered to file civil discrimination suits against employers on behalf of alleged victims. [5] [6] The Commission cannot adjudicate claims or impose administrative sanctions. [7]
Q:I live in a right-to-work state. It actually benefits the employer. I was told by a manager that because it is a right-to-work state they have the right to fire at will. I also worked at Walmart ...
A spokesperson said the Department of Labor investigated complaints against Eldridge Farms and found it owed a total of $109,012 in wages to 22 employees as a result of violations of the H2-A program.
Beware of scams. Working from home is very widespread right now due to the coronavirus pandemic. Unfortunately, so is unemployment. It’s a bit of a perfect storm for a type of scam that’s been ...
The 20 workers sought relief on three claims: 1) That the agency fee was too high to cover only collective bargaining activities as authorized by NLRA Section 8(a)(3); 2) That the high agency fee breached the CWA's duty of fair representation; and 3) That the high agency fee violated the workers' First Amendment rights. [81]