Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The C grammar [1] is not LL(1): The bottom part shows a parser that has digested the tokens "int v;main(){" and is about to choose a rule to derive the nonterminal "Stmt". Looking only at the first lookahead token " v ", it cannot decide which of both alternatives for " Stmt " to choose, since two input continuations are possible.
LL grammars, particularly LL(1) grammars, are of great practical interest, as parsers for these grammars are easy to construct, and many computer languages are designed to be LL(1) for this reason. [8] LL parsers may be table-based, [citation needed] i.e. similar to LR parsers, but LL grammars can also be parsed by recursive descent parsers.
On LL grammars and LR grammars, it essentially performs LL parsing and LR parsing, respectively, while on nondeterministic grammars, it is as efficient as can be expected. Although GLR parsing was developed in the 1980s, many new language definitions and parser generators continue to be based on LL, LALR or LR parsing up to the present day.
Both examples above can be solved by letting the parser use the follow set (see LL parser) of a nonterminal A to decide if it is going to use one of As rules for a reduction; it will only use the rule A → w for a reduction if the next symbol on the input stream is in the follow set of A.
An LL parser is a type of parser that does top-down parsing by applying each production rule to the incoming symbols, working from the left-most symbol yielded on a production rule and then proceeding to the next production rule for each non-terminal symbol encountered. In this way the parsing starts on the Left of the result side (right side ...
In computer science, a left corner parser is a type of chart parser used for parsing context-free grammars.It combines the top-down and bottom-up approaches of parsing. The name derives from the use of the left corner of the grammar's production rules.
Parsing the string "1 - 2 - 3" with the first grammar in an LALR parser (which can handle left-recursive grammars) would have resulted in the parse tree: Left-recursive parsing of a double subtraction. This parse tree groups the terms on the left, giving the correct semantics (1 - 2) - 3. Parsing with the second grammar gives
Another method [8] is to build the parse forest as you go, augmenting each Earley item with a pointer to a shared packed parse forest (SPPF) node labelled with a triple (s, i, j) where s is a symbol or an LR(0) item (production rule with dot), and i and j give the section of the input string derived by this node. A node's contents are either a ...