Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It is imperative that a federal court quickly find Trump’s huge impoundment of federal funds to be unconstitutional as usurping Congress’ spending power, just as a court last week immediately ...
In a case that preceded the passage of the Impoundment Control Act, the Supreme Court ruled in Train v. City of New York in 1975 that presidents cannot impound funds authorized by Congress unless ...
In the hours and days after the Trump administration's funding freeze, California leaders saw chaos and confusion. They fear more devastating effects if the courts don't permanently block such action.
Donald Trump and appointees to his second administration argued the Impoundment Control Act is unconstitutional, though few legal scholars agree. [11] Trump's assertion of this power resulted in the 2025 United States federal government grant pause, which was put on hold by a preliminary court injunction before it took effect.
But Trump also views his ability to impound congressionally appropriated funds as his constitutional right and believes that the court’s decision in Trump v. U.S. grants him that authority.
In late November 2019, the Impoundment Control Act made news during the Trump impeachment investigation, when two budget office staffers resigned over their concerns over apparent improprieties regarding the hold of approved Ukraine military funds. Among the concerns was the questionable transfer of decision-making authority to Michael Duffey ...
How Donald Trump could try to use presidential impoundment to cut federal spending.
Prakash noted that Trump could refuse to spend the agency’s foreign-aid funds, but doing so would likely conflict with the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, a Nixon-era federal law that requires ...