enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Strong's Concordance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong's_Concordance

    Appearing to the right of the scripture reference is the Strong's number. This allows the user of the concordance to look up the meaning of the original language word in the associated dictionary in the back, thereby showing how the original language word was translated into the English word in the KJV Bible. Strong's Concordance includes:

  3. King James Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version

    John Speed's Genealogies recorded in the Sacred Scriptures (1611), bound into first King James Bible in quarto size (1612). The title of the first edition of the translation, in Early Modern English, was "THE HOLY BIBLE, Conteyning the Old Teſtament, AND THE NEW: Newly Tranſlated out of the Originall tongues: & with the former Tranſlations diligently compared and reuiſed, by his Maiesties ...

  4. New Living Translation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Living_Translation

    The New Living Translation (NLT) is a translation of the Bible in contemporary English. Published in 1996 by Tyndale House Foundation , the NLT was created "by 90 leading Bible scholars." [ 4 ] The NLT relies on recently published critical editions of the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.

  5. Green's Literal Translation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green's_Literal_Translation

    A translation of the Bible is no place to show off the vocabulary and erudition of the translator. In addition, every precaution was taken to preserve the particulars of the text; each verb is carefully scrutinized to maintain its tense, number, voice and mood; the case of each noun examined to retain its proper function in sentence; each ...

  6. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    Thus, the argument goes, the more literal the translation is, the less danger there is of corrupting the original message. This is therefore much more of a word-for-word view of translation. The problem with this form of translation is that it assumes a moderate degree of familiarity with the subject matter on the part of the reader.

  7. Literal Standard Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literal_Standard_Version

    The Literal Standard Version (LSV) is a Modern English translation of the Bible with a number of distinctive features. It describes itself as the most literal translation of the Bible into the modern English language. [1] The first edition was published on February 2, 2020. [2] [3]

  8. Qere and Ketiv - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qere_and_Ketiv

    Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener in his 1884 commentary on the 1611 Authorized Version of the Bible (a.k.a. the King James Bible) reports 6637 marginal notes in the KJV Old Testament, of which 31 are instances of the KJV translators drawing attention to qere and ketiv, most being like Psalm 100 verse 3 with ketiv being in the main KJV text and ...

  9. Bible citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_citation

    Citations in the APA style add the translation of the Bible after the verse. [5] For example, (John 3:16, New International Version). Translation names should not be abbreviated (e.g., write out King James Version instead of using KJV). Subsequent citations do not require the translation unless that changes.