Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An infinite series of any rational function of can be reduced to a finite series of polygamma functions, by use of partial fraction decomposition, [8] as explained here. This fact can also be applied to finite series of rational functions, allowing the result to be computed in constant time even when the series contains a large number of terms.
Similarly, in a series, any finite rearrangements of terms of a series does not change the limit of the partial sums of the series and thus does not change the sum of the series: for any finite rearrangement, there will be some term after which the rearrangement did not affect any further terms: any effects of rearrangement can be isolated to ...
The geometric series is an infinite series derived from a special type of sequence called a geometric progression.This means that it is the sum of infinitely many terms of geometric progression: starting from the initial term , and the next one being the initial term multiplied by a constant number known as the common ratio .
The sum of the series is a random variable whose probability density function is close to for values between and , and decreases to near-zero for values greater than or less than . Intermediate between these ranges, at the values ± 2 {\displaystyle \pm 2} , the probability density is 1 8 − ε {\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{8}}-\varepsilon } for ...
The number e can be expressed as the sum of the following infinite series: e x = ∑ k = 0 ∞ x k k ! {\displaystyle e^{x}=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }{\frac {x^{k}}{k!}}} for any real number x . In the special case where x = 1 or −1, we have:
In mathematics, a series is the sum of the terms of an infinite sequence of numbers. More precisely, an infinite sequence (,,, …) defines a series S that is denoted = + + + = =. The n th partial sum S n is the sum of the first n terms of the sequence; that is,
The sum telescopes, leaving = ()!. For other applications, see: Proof that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges, where one of the proofs uses a telescoping sum; Fundamental theorem of calculus, a continuous analog of telescoping series;
A summation method that is linear and stable cannot sum the series 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ to any finite value. (Stable means that adding a term at the beginning of the series increases the sum by the value of the added term.) This can be seen as follows. If + + + =, then adding 0 to both sides gives