Ad
related to: how to correct heteroskedasticity error in research paper analysis format- Free Essay Checker
Proofread your essay with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Do Your Best Work
A writing assistant built for work.
Make excellent writing effortless.
- Grammarly for Google Docs
Write your best in Google Docs.
Instant writing suggestions.
- Grammarly for Students
Proofread your writing with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Free Essay Checker
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An alternative to explicitly modelling the heteroskedasticity is using a resampling method such as the wild bootstrap. Given that the studentized bootstrap, which standardizes the resampled statistic by its standard error, yields an asymptotic refinement, [13] heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors remain nevertheless useful.
Step 3: Select the equation with the highest R 2 and lowest standard errors to represent heteroscedasticity. Step 4: Perform a t-test on the equation selected from step 3 on γ 1 . If γ 1 is statistically significant, reject the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity.
This test, and an estimator for heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors, were proposed by Halbert White in 1980. [1] These methods have become widely used, making this paper one of the most cited articles in economics.
In Julia, the CovarianceMatrices.jl package [11] supports several types of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation including Newey–West, White, and Arellano. In R , the packages sandwich [ 6 ] and plm [ 12 ] include a function for the Newey–West estimator.
There should then be a later stage of analysis to examine whether the errors in the predictions from the regression behave in the same way across the dataset. Thus the question becomes one of the homogeneity of the distribution of the residuals, as the explanatory variables change. See regression analysis.
Thus, regression analysis using heteroscedastic data will still provide an unbiased estimate for the relationship between the predictor variable and the outcome, but standard errors and therefore inferences obtained from data analysis are suspect. Biased standard errors lead to biased inference, so results of hypothesis tests are possibly wrong.
In particular, bias (the expected value of the difference of an estimated parameter and the true underlying value) occurs if an independent variable is correlated with the errors inherent in the underlying process. There are several different possible causes of specification error; some are listed below.
If the test statistic has a p-value below an appropriate threshold (e.g. p < 0.05) then the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity is rejected and heteroskedasticity assumed. If the Breusch–Pagan test shows that there is conditional heteroskedasticity, one could either use weighted least squares (if the source of heteroskedasticity is known) or ...
Ad
related to: how to correct heteroskedasticity error in research paper analysis format