enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Amparo and habeas data in the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amparo_and_habeas_data_in...

    In the Philippines, amparo and habeas data are prerogative writs to supplement the inefficacy of the writ of habeas corpus (Rule 102, Revised Rules of Court). Amparo means 'protection,' while habeas data is 'access to information.' [1] Both writs were conceived to solve the extensive Philippine extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances since 1999.

  3. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    The Court and the Charter: Leading Cases (published in 2008, co-edited by Russell, Morton, Knopff, Thomas Bateman and Janet Hiebert); and; The Court and the Constitution: Leading Cases (published in 2008, co-edited by Russell, Morton, Knopff, Bateman and Hiebert). Decisions in leading cases in Canada have usually been made by the Supreme Court ...

  4. List of major acts and legislation during the presidency of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_acts_and...

    An Act creating three (3) additional branches of the Regional Trial Court in the National Capital Judicial Region to be stationed in the City of Muntinlupa, and appropriating funds therefor, amending for the purpose Section 14(D) of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, otherwise known as "The Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980", as amended October 9, 2024

  5. Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebralinag_v._Division...

    The issue is not freedom of speech but enforcement of law and jurisprudence. State's power to regulate repressive and unlawful religious practices justified, besides having scriptural basis. The penalty of expulsion is legal and valid, more so with the enactment of Executive Order No. 292 (the Administrative Code of 1987).

  6. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v.Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system.

  7. Philippine habeas corpus cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_habeas_corpus_cases

    Even before the cases were decided, Diokno, to the chagrin of the Supreme Court, opted to withdraw his petition on the ground that no fair decision can be made of the court to render him justice. What made it worse was the fact that before the Supreme Court could respond to Diokno's challenge, Marcos issued an order releasing him and the other ...

  8. Category:Supreme Court of the Philippines cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Pages in category "Supreme Court of the Philippines cases" The following 23 pages are in this category, out of 23 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .

  9. Judiciary of the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_the_Philippines

    The judiciary of the Philippines consists of the Supreme Court, which is established in the Constitution, and three levels of lower courts, which are established through law by the Congress of the Philippines. The Supreme Court has expansive powers, able to overrule political and administrative decisions, and with the ability to craft rules and ...

  1. Related searches landmark court decisions examples in philippines law enforcement policy

    landmark court decisionslist of court decisions
    list of landmark decisionsamparo data in the philippines