Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Editor's note: The deadline to submit letters to the editor regarding the Nov. 5 election has passed. Here are this week’s letters to the editor of the Herald Times Reporter .
Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a scholar of fascism and authoritarian leaders at New York University, wrote in May 2024 that Project 2025 "is a plan for an authoritarian takeover of the United States that goes by a deceptively neutral name". She said the project's intent to abolish federal departments and agencies "is to destroy the legal and governance ...
Agenda 47 and Project 2025 share many themes and policies, including expanding presidential power such as through reissuing Schedule F, [21]: min.00:14 [22] cuts to the Department of Education, mass deportations of illegal immigrants, [23] the death penalty for drug dealers, and using the US National Guard in liberal cities with high crime ...
Project 2025 bills itself as “a policy agenda, personnel, training and a 180-day playbook” to be implemented “on day one” by the next Republican president, outlining various agenda items ...
The project aims to promote conservative and right-wing policies to reshape the federal government of the United States and consolidate executive power, originally under the premise that Donald Trump would win the 2024 presidential election. [105] [106] [107] Project 2025 is the ninth iteration of the Mandate for Leadership series, published ...
Leaders of the Democrats’ Project 2025 task force — a group formed in June to push back against the expansive right-wing policy document — launched a confidential tip line Thursday designed ...
And, as Project 2025 proposes, Reagan attempted to eliminate the Department of Education but settled for gutting its funding in a manner that set public education, in the words of author Jonathan ...
Study after study finds a positive association between immigration and long-run economic growth--and therefore, ultimately, the living standards of all Americans. The Trump Administration's immigration [restrictions] may achieve a temporary boost in wages of the low-paid now, but at a cost to the country's future prosperity." [356]