Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Criticism of socialism is any critique of socialist economics and socialist models of organization and their feasibility, as well as the political and social implications of adopting such a system. Some critiques are not necessarily directed toward socialism as a system but rather toward the socialist movement , parties , or existing states .
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 17 December 2024. Political philosophy emphasising social ownership of production For other uses, see Socialism (disambiguation). Part of a series on Socialism History Outline Development French Revolution Revolutions of 1848 Socialist calculation debate Socialist economics Ideas Calculation in kind ...
Negative and positive rights; ... Ethical socialism is a political philosophy that appeals to ... with positive ideals based on moral and ethical grounds ...
Socialism has been described as a philosophy seeking distributive justice, and communism as a subset of socialism that prefers economic equality as its form of distributive justice. [77] In 19th century Europe, the use of the terms communism and socialism eventually accorded with the cultural attitude of adherents and opponents towards religion.
Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperative ownership, or citizen ownership of equity. [12] Socialism has numerous variants and so no single definition encapsulating all of them exists, [ 13 ] with its definition subject to ongoing academic scrutiny and redefining, [ 14 ] although social ownership acts as a common element shared ...
Libertarian socialism, sometimes called left-libertarianism, [221] [222] social anarchism [223] [224] and socialist libertarianism, [225] is a political philosophy within the socialist movement that reject the view of socialism as state ownership or command of the means of production [226] within a more general criticism of the state form ...
Taylor suggests that negative liberty is little more than a philosophical term and that real liberty is achieved when significant social and economic inequalities are also considered. He proposed dialectical positive liberty as a means to gaining both negative and positive liberty, by overcoming the inequalities that divide us.
Taylor, therefore, argues for a distinction between negative and positive liberty that highlights the importance of social justice. Therefore, if social justice is a major part of equality, then liberty is not a synonym of lack of obstacles, but being able to grasp those obstacles, to discuss and work to overcome them. [14]