Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
That is, positive utility functions as a tiebreaker in that it determines which outcome is better (or less bad) when the outcomes considered have equal disutility. [21] "Lexical threshold" negative utilitarianism says that there is some disutility, for instance some extreme suffering, such that no positive utility can counterbalance it. [22 ...
Bentham said that it was the placing of women in a legally inferior position that made him choose in 1759, at the age of eleven, the career of a reformist, [70] though American critic John Neal claimed to have convinced him to take up women's rights issues during their association between 1825 and 1827. [71]
Punishment might make "bad people" into "better" ones. For the utilitarian, all that "bad person" can mean is "person who's likely to cause unwanted things (like suffering)". So, utilitarianism could recommend punishment that changes someone such that they are less likely to cause bad things. Successful rehabilitation would reduce recidivism. [155]
The demandingness objection is a common [1] [2] argument raised against utilitarianism and other consequentialist ethical theories. The consequentialist requirement that we maximize the good impartially seems to this objection to require us to perform acts that we would normally consider optional.
Bad or incomplete data can lead to underestimating women’s health issues, influencing both the care that they receive and how societies allocate resources to women’s health.
“It is bad for women at Forestry,” Megan told Oregon Live. “It is even worse if you are queer .” Megan Donecker claimed her boss Mike Shaw favored qualifications over gender and identity ...
In ethics, welfarism is a theory that well-being, what is good for someone or what makes a life worth living, is the only thing that has intrinsic value.In its most general sense, it can be defined as descriptive theory about what has value but some philosophers also understand welfarism as a moral theory, that what one should do is ultimately determined by considerations of well-being.
It might instead be a good time to take a pause to think, plan and regroup for what will be the lifetime of activism and advocacy required to achieve the more perfect union so many women yearn to see.