enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Arithmetic progression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_progression

    The sum of the members of a finite arithmetic progression is called an arithmetic series. For example, consider the sum: + + + + = This sum can be found quickly by taking the number n of terms being added (here 5), multiplying by the sum of the first and last number in the progression (here 2 + 14 = 16), and dividing by 2: (+)

  3. Series (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_(mathematics)

    The infinite sequence of additions expressed by a series cannot be explicitly performed in sequence in a finite amount of time. However, if the terms and their finite sums belong to a set that has limits, it may be possible to assign a value to a series, called the sum of the series.

  4. Fejér's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fejér's_theorem

    Proof: a) Given that is the mean of , the integral of which is 1, by linearity, the integral of is also equal to 1.. b) As () is a geometric sum, we get an simple formula for () and then for (),using De Moivre's formula :

  5. Basel problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_problem

    The sum of the series is approximately equal to 1.644934. [3] The Basel problem asks for the exact sum of this series (in closed form ), as well as a proof that this sum is correct. Euler found the exact sum to be π 2 / 6 {\displaystyle \pi ^{2}/6} and announced this discovery in 1735.

  6. Cesàro summation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summation

    The Cesàro sum is defined as the limit, as n tends to infinity, of the sequence of arithmetic means of the first n partial sums of the series. This special case of a matrix summability method is named for the Italian analyst Ernesto Cesàro (1859–1906).

  7. Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet's_theorem_on...

    Although the proof of Dirichlet's Theorem makes use of calculus and analytic number theory, some proofs of examples are much more straightforward. In particular, the proof of the example of infinitely many primes of the form + makes an argument similar to the one made in the proof of Euclid's theorem (Silverman 2013). The proof is given below:

  8. 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E...

    A summation method that is linear and stable cannot sum the series 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ to any finite value. (Stable means that adding a term at the beginning of the series increases the sum by the value of the added term.) This can be seen as follows. If + + + =, then adding 0 to both sides gives

  9. Perron's formula - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perron's_formula

    In mathematics, and more particularly in analytic number theory, Perron's formula is a formula due to Oskar Perron to calculate the sum of an arithmetic function, by means of an inverse Mellin transform.