Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A variant of Gaussian elimination called Gauss–Jordan elimination can be used for finding the inverse of a matrix, if it exists. If A is an n × n square matrix, then one can use row reduction to compute its inverse matrix, if it exists. First, the n × n identity matrix is augmented to the right of A, forming an n × 2n block matrix [A | I].
The matrices L and U could be thought to have "encoded" the Gaussian elimination process. The cost of solving a system of linear equations is approximately 2 3 n 3 {\textstyle {\frac {2}{3}}n^{3}} floating-point operations if the matrix A {\textstyle A} has size n {\textstyle n} .
The pivot or pivot element is the element of a matrix, or an array, which is selected first by an algorithm (e.g. Gaussian elimination, simplex algorithm, etc.), to do certain calculations. In the case of matrix algorithms, a pivot entry is usually required to be at least distinct from zero, and often distant from it; in this case finding this ...
No (partial) pivoting is necessary for a strictly column diagonally dominant matrix when performing Gaussian elimination (LU factorization). The Jacobi and Gauss–Seidel methods for solving a linear system converge if the matrix is strictly (or irreducibly) diagonally dominant. Many matrices that arise in finite element methods are diagonally ...
Simplified forms of Gaussian elimination have been developed for these situations. [ 6 ] The textbook Numerical Mathematics by Alfio Quarteroni , Sacco and Saleri, lists a modified version of the algorithm which avoids some of the divisions (using instead multiplications), which is beneficial on some computer architectures.
To compute the inverse, you need to do Gaussian elimination on the matrix [A I] which has size (2m) × m. I don't know the cost for this, but I assume it is the same 8/3 m 3 as PDBailey quotes. Trefethen and Bau say on the next page that a slightly smarter method, making use of the sparsity of I , costs only 2 m 3 operations.
The field of numerical analysis predates the invention of modern computers by many centuries. Linear interpolation was already in use more than 2000 years ago. Many great mathematicians of the past were preoccupied by numerical analysis, [5] as is obvious from the names of important algorithms like Newton's method, Lagrange interpolation polynomial, Gaussian elimination, or Euler's method.
Once the eigenvalues are computed, the eigenvectors could be calculated by solving the equation (), = using Gaussian elimination or any other method for solving matrix equations. However, in practical large-scale eigenvalue methods, the eigenvectors are usually computed in other ways, as a byproduct of the eigenvalue computation.