Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The question of independence, "turns on whether a director is, for any substantial reason, incapable of making a decision with only the best interests of the corporation in mind."3 That is, the independence test ultimately "focus[es] on impartiality and objectivity."4 In this case, the SLC has failed to demonstrate that no material factual ...
The case is Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-04792. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)
The dispute centered on the use of parts of the Java programming language's application programming interfaces (APIs) and about 11,000 lines of source code, which are owned by Oracle (through subsidiary, Oracle America, Inc., originating from Sun Microsystems), within early versions of the Android operating system by Google.
Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini St., Inc., 209 F. Supp. 3d 1200 (D. Nev. 2016); 879 F.3d 948, 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 2018); cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 52 (2018). Holding A federal district court's discretion to award "full costs" to a party in copyright litigation pursuant to 17 U. S. C. §505 is limited to the six categories specified in the ...
Oracle (NAS: ORCL) has a long history of growth, a demonstrated competitive advantage, and strong, if overcompensated, management. These factors, combined with its valuation (16 times earnings ...
Oracle CASE 1 Oracle CASE 2 Oracle CASE 3 Oracle CASE 4 Oracle CASE 5 - developed using SQL*Forms 3 character mode screens Oracle CASE 5.1 was a major redevelopment where the screens were redeveloped using the Oracle Forms 4.0 which provided a GUI interface The version numbers get confusing at this point because the numbers go backwards.
Oracle was required to prove that the two parties would have agreed on the hypothetical license and license fees, but Oracle had no such evidence. Oracle did not provide facts on previous licensing history or practices. Oracle also failed to provide evidence on benchmark licenses, such as negotiated licenses for comparable works.
Oracle cloning is the re-use of the once-constructed random oracle within the same proof (this in practice corresponds to the multiple uses of the same cryptographic hash within one algorithm for different purposes). [7] Oracle cloning with improper domain separation breaks security proofs and can lead to successful attacks. [8]