Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects special counsel Jack Smith’s request to fast-track a ruling on whether presidential immunity protects former President Donald Trump from being prosecuted for his ...
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".
He is asking the justices to reject the Colorado Supreme Court's conclusion that he is disqualified from running for president. Trump's Supreme Court Brief Rebuts the Claim That He 'Engaged in ...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Donald Trump on Tuesday filed a U.S. Supreme Court brief in his bid for criminal immunity for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss, arguing that a former president ...
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for his official acts as president plunges a major criminal case against him into doubt and all but assures he will ...
A three-judge panel at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia affirms a lower court’s ruling that former President Donald Trump can be sued by U.S. Capitol Police officers ...
A clerk for the New York County Supreme Court enters in the judgment for former President Donald Trump’s financial fraud trial and New York Attorney General Letitia James submits paperwork that ...
To arrest someone, you have to have a criminal statute. A court decision is not a criminal statute. You can't make something a crime with a U.S. Supreme Court decision. The statute that was the subject of the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio was, according to the article, an Ohio criminal syndicalism statute. The statute was ruled to be invalid.