Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".
While Trump's brief claims that his speech at the Ellipse was protected by the First Amendment, [70] theirs argues that it was not because it qualified as an inciting speech under Brandenburg v. Ohio. [71] Whereas Trump's brief claims that disqualification under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is limited to holding office, as opposed to ...
He is asking the justices to reject the Colorado Supreme Court's conclusion that he is disqualified from running for president. Trump's Supreme Court Brief Rebuts the Claim That He 'Engaged in ...
Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday told the Supreme Court he should be granted immunity for his effort to overturn the 2020 election results that culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395; Shouting fire in a crowded theater; Threatening the president of the United States; Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444 (1969) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494 (1951) Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S ...
A three-judge panel at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia affirms a lower court’s ruling that former President Donald Trump can be sued by U.S. Capitol Police officers ...
The Supreme Court's decision to hear arguments on Trump's immunity bid next month postponed the trial, giving him a boost as he tries to delay prosecutions while running to regain the presidency ...
To arrest someone, you have to have a criminal statute. A court decision is not a criminal statute. You can't make something a crime with a U.S. Supreme Court decision. The statute that was the subject of the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio was, according to the article, an Ohio criminal syndicalism statute. The statute was ruled to be invalid.