Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This type of stack is also known as an execution stack, program stack, control stack, run-time stack, or machine stack, and is often shortened to simply the "stack". Although maintenance of the call stack is important for the proper functioning of most software , the details are normally hidden and automatic in high-level programming languages .
A typical call stack, storing local data and call information for multiple levels of procedure calls. This stack grows downward from its origin. The stack pointer points to the current topmost datum on the stack. A push operation decrements the pointer and copies the data to the stack; a pop operation copies data from the stack and then ...
The stack is often used to store variables of fixed length local to the currently active functions. Programmers may further choose to explicitly use the stack to store local data of variable length. If a region of memory lies on the thread's stack, that memory is said to have been allocated on the stack, i.e. stack-based memory allocation (SBMA).
To save a value to the stack, the PUSH instruction is used. To retrieve a value from the stack, the POP instruction is used. Example: Assuming that SS = 1000h and SP = 0xF820. This means that current stack top is the physical address 0x1F820 (this is due to memory segmentation in 8086). The next two machine instructions of the program are:
The return value (or a pointer to it) is returned in a register. Some conventions use registers for the first few parameters which may improve performance, especially for short and simple leaf-routines very frequently invoked (i.e. routines that do not call other routines). Example call:
In computing, a stack trace (also called stack backtrace [1] or stack traceback [2]) is a report of the active stack frames at a certain point in time during the execution of a program. When a program is run, memory is often dynamically allocated in two places: the stack and the heap. Memory is continuously allocated on a stack but not on a ...
load the int value 0 onto the stack iconst_1 04 0000 0100 → 1 load the int value 1 onto the stack iconst_2 05 0000 0101 → 2 load the int value 2 onto the stack iconst_3 06 0000 0110 → 3 load the int value 3 onto the stack iconst_4 07 0000 0111 → 4 load the int value 4 onto the stack iconst_5 08 0000 1000 → 5
I don't think it is a good idea to merge them, since they are different concepts, the Call stack is a method that uses Stack-based memory allocation, but they are not the same thing. JorgeFierro 23:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC) Agreed. A call stack is stack-based memory allocation, but stack-based memory allocation is not a call stack.