enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Cities_of_the...

    On March 31, 2009, the Court, by a vote of 7–5, denied the first motion for reconsideration. [3] The second motion for reconsideration was denied on April 28, 2009. [4] On December 21, 2009, the Court, by a vote of 6-4 reversed its November 18, 2008, decision and declared the Cityhood Laws as constitutional.

  3. GSIS–Meralco bribery case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSIS–Meralco_bribery_case

    He said the IRCA (Internal Rules of the Court of Appeals) does not require the justices who issued the TRO be the same justices to render the decision. The Court of Appeals Reorganization Office Order No. 200-08-CMV was issued by Presiding Justice Vasquez on July 4, three weeks before the decision was released.

  4. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v.Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system.

  5. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    Landmark cases in the United States come most frequently (but not exclusively) from the Supreme Court of the United States. United States Courts of Appeals may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case, or adopts the holding of the court below.

  6. Category:Supreme Court of the Philippines cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Pages in category "Supreme Court of the Philippines cases" The following 23 pages are in this category, out of 23 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. B.

  7. Amparo and habeas data in the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amparo_and_habeas_data_in...

    In the Philippines, amparo and habeas data are prerogative writs to supplement the inefficacy of the writ of habeas corpus (Rule 102, Revised Rules of Court). Amparo means 'protection,' while habeas data is 'access to information.' [1] Both writs were conceived to solve the extensive Philippine extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances since 1999.

  8. People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    Court of Appeals: Rappler Inc. v. SEC (CA-G.R. SP No. 154292) Pasig City RTC Branch 265: People of the Philippines v. Maria Ressa (R-PSG-19-00737-CR) Alleged defamation: Manila RTC Branch 46: People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler (R-MNL-19-01141-CR) Alleged tax evasion: Pasig City RTC Branch 165: People of the

  9. Sandiganbayan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandiganbayan

    Facade in 2023. The Sandiganbayan (lit. ' Support of the nation ' [2]) is a special appellate collegial court in the Philippines that has jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt practices and other offenses committed by public officers and employees, including those in government-owned and controlled corporations.