Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An object is similar to a map—both let you set keys to values, retrieve those values, delete keys, and detect whether a value is stored at a key. For this reason (and because there were no built-in alternatives), objects historically have been used as maps. However, there are important differences that make a map preferable in certain cases.
A small phone book as a hash table. In computer science, a hash table is a data structure that implements an associative array, also called a dictionary or simply map; an associative array is an abstract data type that maps keys to values. [3]
Maps are data structures that associate a key with an element. This lets the map be very flexible. If the key is the hash code of the element, the Map is essentially a Set. If it's just an increasing number, it becomes a list. Examples of Map implementations include java.util.HashMap, java.util.LinkedHashMap, and java.util.TreeMap.
In a hash table, a hash function takes a key as an input, which is associated with a datum or record and used to identify it to the data storage and retrieval application. The keys may be fixed-length, like an integer, or variable-length, like a name. In some cases, the key is the datum itself.
Linear probing is a component of open addressing schemes for using a hash table to solve the dictionary problem.In the dictionary problem, a data structure should maintain a collection of key–value pairs subject to operations that insert or delete pairs from the collection or that search for the value associated with a given key.
A minimal perfect hash function F is order preserving if keys are given in some order a 1, a 2, ..., a n and for any keys a j and a k, j < k implies F(a j) < F(a k). [9] In this case, the function value is just the position of each key in the sorted ordering of all of the keys.
Keys are unique identifiers which map to particular values, which in turn can be anything from addresses, to documents, to arbitrary data. [2] Responsibility for maintaining the mapping from keys to values is distributed among the nodes, in such a way that a change in the set of participants causes a minimal amount of disruption.
As can be derived from the operations, this data structure does not need to store the keys at all and may actually use less space than would be needed for a simple list of the key value pairs. This makes it attractive in situations where the associated data is small (e.g. a few bits) compared to the keys because we can save a lot by reducing ...