Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Panspermia as it is known today, however, is not identical to this original theory. The name, as applied to this theory, was only first coined in 1908 by Svante Arrhenius , a Swedish scientist. [ 14 ] [ 19 ] Prior to this, since around the 1860s, many prominent scientists were becoming interested in the theory, for example Sir Fred Hoyle , and ...
The theory held that "lower" animals are generated by decaying organic substances. Aristotle stated that, for example, aphids arise from dew on plants, flies from putrid matter, mice from dirty hay, and crocodiles from rotting sunken logs. [16] The basic idea was that life was continuously created as a result of chance events. [17]
Pseudo-panspermia (sometimes called soft panspermia, molecular panspermia or quasi-panspermia) is a well-supported hypothesis for a stage in the origin of life. The theory first asserts that many of the small organic molecules used for life originated in space (for example, being incorporated in the solar nebula , from which the planets condensed).
Panspermia did not get much scientific support and deflects the need of an answer instead of explaining observable phenomena. Although interest in panspermia grew when traces of organic materials were found in meteorites, it is currently accepted that life started locally on Earth. [33]
Directed panspermia is a type of panspermia that implies the deliberate transport of microorganisms into space to be used as introduced species on other astronomical objects. Historically, Shklovskii and Sagan (1966) and Crick and Orgel (1973) hypothesized that life on the Earth may have been seeded deliberately by other civilizations.
Information panspermia is discussed in: [7] "Gurzadyan’s idea offers a straightforward practical consequence: we should study alleged SETI signals from the point of view of the algorithmic information theory and we should try to identify and decode possible bit strings hidden in the noise."
The junkyard tornado argument has been taken out of its original context by theists to argue for intelligent design, and has since become a mainstay in the rejection of evolution by religious groups, even though Fred Hoyle declared himself an atheist, [1] and even though the junkyard tornado argument is considered a fallacy in its original ...
Impact survival is a theory that life, usually in the form of microbial bacteria, can survive under the extreme conditions of a major impact event, such as a meteorite striking the surface of a planet. [1] This step is necessary for the possibility of panspermia.