Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An alternative to explicitly modelling the heteroskedasticity is using a resampling method such as the wild bootstrap. Given that the studentized bootstrap, which standardizes the resampled statistic by its standard error, yields an asymptotic refinement, [13] heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors remain nevertheless useful.
Heteroscedasticity often occurs when there is a large difference among the sizes of the observations. A classic example of heteroscedasticity is that of income versus expenditure on meals. A wealthy person may eat inexpensive food sometimes and expensive food at other times. A poor person will almost always eat inexpensive food.
Step 3: Select the equation with the highest R 2 and lowest standard errors to represent heteroscedasticity. Step 4: Perform a t-test on the equation selected from step 3 on γ 1. If γ 1 is statistically significant, reject the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity.
In Julia, the CovarianceMatrices.jl package [11] supports several types of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation including Newey–West, White, and Arellano. In R , the packages sandwich [ 6 ] and plm [ 12 ] include a function for the Newey–West estimator.
An alternative to the White test is the Breusch–Pagan test, where the Breusch-Pagan test is designed to detect only linear forms of heteroskedasticity. Under certain conditions and a modification of one of the tests, they can be found to be algebraically equivalent.
Plot with random data showing heteroscedasticity: The variance of the y-values of the dots increases with increasing values of x. In statistics, a sequence of random variables is homoscedastic (/ ˌ h oʊ m oʊ s k ə ˈ d æ s t ɪ k /) if all its random variables have the same finite variance; this is also known as homogeneity of variance ...
The resulting likelihood function is mathematically similar to the tobit model for censored dependent variables, a connection first drawn by James Heckman in 1974. [2] Heckman also developed a two-step control function approach to estimate this model, [ 3 ] which avoids the computational burden of having to estimate both equations jointly ...
This is why some authors prefer to use OLS and reformulate their inferences by simply considering an alternative estimator for the variance of the estimator robust to heteroscedasticity or serial autocorrelation. However, for large samples, FGLS is preferred over OLS under heteroskedasticity or serial correlation.