Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A variant of Gaussian elimination called Gauss–Jordan elimination can be used for finding the inverse of a matrix, if it exists. If A is an n × n square matrix, then one can use row reduction to compute its inverse matrix, if it exists. First, the n × n identity matrix is augmented to the right of A, forming an n × 2n block matrix [A | I].
Simplified forms of Gaussian elimination have been developed for these situations. [ 6 ] The textbook Numerical Mathematics by Alfio Quarteroni , Sacco and Saleri, lists a modified version of the algorithm which avoids some of the divisions (using instead multiplications), which is beneficial on some computer architectures.
Thus the name Gaussian elimination is only a convenient abbreviation of a complex history. The Polish astronomer Tadeusz Banachiewicz introduced the LU decomposition in 1938. [4] To quote: "It appears that Gauss and Doolittle applied the method [of elimination] only to symmetric equations.
The reduced row echelon form of a matrix is unique and does not depend on the sequence of elementary row operations used to obtain it. The variant of Gaussian elimination that transforms a matrix to reduced row echelon form is sometimes called Gauss–Jordan elimination. A matrix is in column echelon form if its transpose is in row echelon form.
Once the eigenvalues are computed, the eigenvectors could be calculated by solving the equation (), = using Gaussian elimination or any other method for solving matrix equations. However, in practical large-scale eigenvalue methods, the eigenvectors are usually computed in other ways, as a byproduct of the eigenvalue computation.
The Schur complement arises when performing a block Gaussian elimination on the matrix M.In order to eliminate the elements below the block diagonal, one multiplies the matrix M by a block lower triangular matrix on the right as follows: = [] [] [] = [], where I p denotes a p×p identity matrix.
Gaussian algorithm may refer to: Gaussian elimination for solving systems of linear equations; Gauss's algorithm for Determination of the day of the week; Gauss's method for preliminary orbit determination; Gauss's Easter algorithm; Gauss separation algorithm
In the case of n equations in n unknowns, it requires computation of n + 1 determinants, while Gaussian elimination produces the result with the same computational complexity as the computation of a single determinant. [8] [9] [verification needed] Cramer's rule can also be numerically unstable even for 2×2 systems. [10]