Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Colorado Supreme Court agreed that Trump engaged in an insurrection, but ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does, in fact, apply to the presidency, meaning that Trump could not appear ...
Indiana University law professor Gerard Magliocca, an expert on the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban,” testifies at former President Donald Trump’s disqualification trial in Colorado ...
What does the 14th Amendment say? The so-called insurrection clause, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, ... Trump doesn’t need to win Colorado in the 2024 November election, as the state holds ...
Using the 14th Amendment to derail Trump’s candidacy has always been seen as a legal longshot, but gained significant momentum with a win in Colorado’s top court in December, on its way to the ...
Colorado District Court Judge Sarah Wallace issued a stunning 102-page decision Friday, that found Trump “engaged in an insurrection” on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the 14th Amendment ...
The state Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Trump was ineligible for the state's primary ballot because he violated the U.S. Constitution's insurrection clause. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment ...
The high court's decision reverses a lower court's ruling that said Trump had engaged in insurrection by inciting a riot on Jan. 6, 2021, but that presidents are not subject to Section 3 of the ...