Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, 604 U.S. ___ (2025), was a United States Supreme Court case brought by ByteDance Ltd. and TikTok on the constitutionality of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) based on the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Bill of Attainder Clause of Article One, Section Nine, and the Due Process Clause and Takings ...
Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.
C-SPAN video page (limited) C-SPAN (limited) ca11.uscourts.gov: C-SPAN video page (limited) United States: Distinct of Columbia Circuit Appellate U.S. Ct. of App. for the D.C. Cir. D.C. Cir. No YT @USCourtsCADC: No C-SPAN (limited) cadc.uscourts.gov: C-SPAN video page (limited) United States: Federal Circuit Appellate
Senior Circuit Judge Sandra Lynch: Boston, MA: 1946 1995–2022 2008–2015 2022–present Clinton: 28 Senior Circuit Judge Kermit Lipez: Portland, ME: 1941 1998–2011 — 2011–present Clinton: 29 Senior Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Howard: Concord, NH: 1955 2002–2022 2015–2022 2022–present G.W. Bush: 30 Senior Circuit Judge O. Rogeriee ...
(Reuters) -Alphabet's Google asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to throw out a jury verdict and a judge's order forcing it to revamp its app store Play. In its first detailed argument to the ...
Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023), was a case at the Supreme Court of the United States which dealt with the question of whether or not recommender systems are covered by liability exemptions under section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was established by section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, for Internet service providers (ISPs) in dealing with terrorism ...
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared unreceptive to Texas' arguments that its new immigration law should take effect because it "mirrors" federal law.
The nation’s high court heard oral arguments in the first case of its term, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, which will determine whether the Clean Water Act applies to wetlands.