enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Davis (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(2019)

    On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion on January 31, 2017, denying both defendants’ challenges and affirming the district court’s judgment below. [2] The defendants petitioned the US Supreme Court for certiorari, and following the Court’s decision in Sessions v.

  3. File:Davis v. United States (2020).pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Davis_v._United...

    This file is a work of an officer or employee of the Supreme Court of the United States, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government , the file is in the public domain in the United States.

  4. Davis v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States

    United States Supreme Court cases titled Davis v. United States: Davis v. United States, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), a per curiam opinion; Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule) Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (invocation of the right to counsel under Miranda) Davis v.

  5. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  6. Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1994)

    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established that the right to counsel can only be legally asserted by an "unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel." [1] Legal scholars have criticized this case stating that the "bright line" rule established under Edwards v.

  7. Davis v. United States (1990) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1990)

    Davis v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] It concerned claims made by parents of two missionaries of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, that their monetary contributions toward their sons' mission expenses constituted a "charitable contribution" under provisions of Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-1(g) (1989), a position that ...

  8. Kim Davis hopes her case overturns Supreme Court’s gay ...

    www.aol.com/kim-davis-hopes-her-case-172357446.html

    800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in ... as grounds to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that legalized same sex marriage in 2015. ... Kim Davis is a free ...

  9. United States v. Davis (1962) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(1962)

    United States v. Davis , 370 U.S. 65 (1962), is a federal income tax case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1962, holding that a taxpayer recognizes a gain on the transfer of appreciated property in satisfaction of a legal obligation.