Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cardinality can be used to compare an aspect of finite sets. For example, the sets {1,2,3} and {4,5,6} are not equal, but have the same cardinality, namely three. This is established by the existence of a bijection (i.e., a one-to-one correspondence) between the two sets, such as the correspondence {1→4, 2→5, 3→6}.
The continuum hypothesis says that =, i.e. is the smallest cardinal number bigger than , i.e. there is no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of the integers and that of the real numbers. The continuum hypothesis is independent of ZFC , a standard axiomatization of set theory; that is, it is impossible to prove the continuum ...
In set theory, a regular cardinal is a cardinal number that is equal to its own cofinality. More explicitly, this means that κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is a regular cardinal if and only if every unbounded subset C ⊆ κ {\displaystyle C\subseteq \kappa } has cardinality κ {\displaystyle \kappa } .
The use of Scott's trick for cardinal numbers shows how the method is typically employed. The initial definition of a cardinal number is an equivalence class of sets, where two sets are equivalent if there is a bijection between them.
It is arranged roughly in order of the consistency strength of the axiom asserting the existence of cardinals with the given property. Existence of a cardinal number κ of a given type implies the existence of cardinals of most of the types listed above that type, and for most listed cardinal descriptions φ of lesser consistency strength, V κ ...
is a finite set with five elements. The number of elements of a finite set is a natural number (possibly zero) and is called the cardinality (or the cardinal number) of the set. A set that is not a finite set is called an infinite set. For example, the set of all positive integers is infinite:
Cardinal functions are widely used in topology as a tool for describing various topological properties. [2] [3] Below are some examples.(Note: some authors, arguing that "there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology", [4] prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never taken on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the ...
the set of all algebraic numbers, the set of all computable numbers, the set of all computable functions, the set of all binary strings of finite length, and; the set of all finite subsets of any given countably infinite set. These infinite ordinals: ω, ω + 1, ω⋅2, ω 2 are among the countably infinite sets. [6] For example, the sequence ...