enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Patentable subject matter in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter...

    In October 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued interim guidelines [32] for patent examiners to determine if a given claimed invention meets the statutory requirements of being a useful process, manufacture, composition of matter or machine (35 U.S.C. § 101). These guidelines assert that a process, including a ...

  3. Patentable subject matter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter

    Patentable subject matter in the United States is governed by 35 U.S.C. 101. The two particularly contentious areas, with numerous reversals of prior legislative and judicial decisions, have been computer-based and biological inventions. [9] [10] The US practice of patentable subject matter is very different from that of the European Patent Office.

  4. United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_patent_law

    The "patentability" of inventions (defining the types things that qualify for patent protection) is defined under Sections 100–105. Most notably, section 101 [9] sets out "subject matter" that can be patented; section 102 [10] defines "novelty" and "statutory bars" to patent protection; section 103 [11] requires that an invention to be "non ...

  5. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manual_of_Patent_Examining...

    The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) is published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for use by patent attorneys and agents and patent examiners. It describes all of the laws and regulations that must be followed in the examination of U.S. patent applications , and articulates their application to an enormous ...

  6. Utility (patentability requirement) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_(patentability...

    As provided by 35 U.S.C. § 101, an invention is "useful" if it provides some identifiable benefit and is capable of use and "useless" otherwise. [2] The majority of inventions are usually not challenged as lacking utility, [3] but the doctrine prevents the patenting of fantastic or hypothetical devices such as perpetual motion machines. [4]

  7. Bilski v. Kappos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilski_v._Kappos

    Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather "a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101."

  8. Title 35 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_35_of_the_United...

    Section 101 - Inventions patentable [ edit ] Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

  9. United States Patent and Trademark Office - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patent_and...

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is an agency in the U.S. Department of Commerce that serves as the national patent office and trademark registration authority for the United States. The USPTO's headquarters are in Alexandria, Virginia, after a 2005 move from the Crystal City area of neighboring Arlington, Virginia.