Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, or, the list of article ideas that are really, really really bad; so bad that administrators are allowed to delete them on the spot. Wikipedia:Fart; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, list of "prohibited" items Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia:Starting an article
An article about how Tyson Foods is run by a bunch of chicken fuckers because the main article is protected from vandalism by the legions of Internet trolls. [citation needed] Yet another list of Google Doodles. If you can't tell from the endless list of cat pictures in this article, individual cats are usua lly not notable enough for a ...
John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns ...
Non-sensical articles. Wikipedia has a large number of articles which could be considered rather irrelevant for something billing itself as an encyclopedia, such as "teh" (a misspelling of the word "the"), List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck", Goatse (an Internet shock site), Toilets in Japan, and The Flowers of Romance ...
Each entry on this list should be an article on its own (not merely a section in a less unusual article) and of decent quality, and in large meeting Wikipedia's manual of style. For unusual contributions that are of greater levity, see Wikipedia:Silly Things. In this list, a star indicates a featured article. A plus indicates a good article.
The most well-known bot that fights vandalism is ClueBot NG. The bot was created by Wikipedia users Christopher Breneman and Naomi Amethyst in 2010 (succeeding the original ClueBot created in 2007; NG stands for Next Generation) [9] and uses machine learning and Bayesian statistics to determine if an edit is vandalism.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 22 December 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...
A small minus sign inside a circle in the top-right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is bad. The process for designating an article as a bad article is intentionally byzantine and indecipherable. Any editor, preferably one who creates or ruins an article, who believes that the article meets the bad article criteria, may ...