enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Premise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

    A premise or premiss [a] is a proposition—a true or false declarative statement—used in an argument to prove the truth of another proposition called the conclusion. [1] Arguments consist of a set of premises and a conclusion. An argument is meaningful for its conclusion only when all of its premises are true. If one or more premises are ...

  3. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    In English the words therefore, so, because and hence typically separate the premises from the conclusion of an argument. Thus: Socrates is a man, all men are mortal therefore Socrates is mortal is an argument because the assertion Socrates is mortal follows from the preceding statements.

  4. Argument map - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map

    Statements 1 and 2 are dependent premises or co-premises. Independent premises , where the premise can support the conclusion on its own: Although independent premises may jointly make the conclusion more convincing, this is to be distinguished from situations where a premise gives no support unless it is joined to another premise.

  5. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    In modern usage, it has come to refer to an argument in which the premises assume the conclusion without supporting it. This makes it an example of circular reasoning. [1] [2] Some examples are: "People have known for thousands of years that the earth is round. Therefore, the earth is round." "Drugs are illegal so they must be bad for you.

  6. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    Deductively valid arguments can be known to be so without recourse to experience, so they must be knowable a priori. [1] However, formality alone does not guarantee that logical consequence is not influenced by empirical knowledge. So the a priori property of logical consequence is considered to be independent of formality. [1]

  7. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    Interpretive argumentation is a dialogical process in which participants explore and/or resolve interpretations often of a text of any medium containing significant ambiguity in meaning. Interpretive argumentation is pertinent to the humanities , hermeneutics , literary theory , linguistics , semantics , pragmatics , semiotics , analytic ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference

    That is, the word "valid" does not refer to the truth of the premises or the conclusion, but rather to the form of the inference. An inference can be valid even if the parts are false, and can be invalid even if some parts are true. But a valid form with true premises will always have a true conclusion.