enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Competence (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competence_(law)

    In United States and Canadian law [citation needed], competence concerns the mental capacity of an individual to participate in legal proceedings or transactions, and the mental condition a person must have to be responsible for his or her decisions or acts. Competence is an attribute that is decision-specific.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    See also Furman v. Georgia (1972), and Gregg v. Georgia (1976) 1st 1986 Ford v. Wainwright: Preventing the execution [capital punishment] of the insane, requiring an evaluation of competency and an evidentiary hearing 8th 1989 Penry v. Lynaugh: Executing persons with mental retardation is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Overturned in ...

  4. Competency evaluation (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competency_evaluation_(law)

    Although the statutes addressing competency vary from state to state in the United States, the two elements outlined in the Dusky v. United States decision are held in common as the minimum federal requirement to be deemed competent. The defendant must understand the charges and have the ability to aid his attorney in his own defense.

  5. Testamentary capacity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testamentary_capacity

    At this point the burden of proving capacity moves to the propounder of the will to then show that there was testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed. [7] [8] The current test comes from the decision in Banks v Goodfellow (1870). [9] This case concerned the validity of the will of John Banks.

  6. Dusky v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dusky_v._United_States

    Although the statutes addressing competency vary from state to state in the United States, the two elements outlined in the decision are held in common: The defendant must understand the charges against him or her; The defendant must have the ability to aid his or her attorney in his or her own defense. [1] [3] Subsequently, in Godinez v.

  7. Surrogate decision-maker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogate_decision-maker

    A study was conducted aiming to describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults. It was concluded that physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated. [2]

  8. Top 10 moments on 'The View' in 2024: Kamala Harris bungles ...

    www.aol.com/top-10-moments-view-2024-100016348.html

    ABC's "The View" was home to several contentious moments and prominent Democratic interviews in 2024, including a key moment of VP Kamala Harris' campaign.

  9. Indiana v. Edwards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_v._Edwards

    The Court had recognized these two rights on competency for some time. In Dusky v.United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), and in Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975), the Court established the standard for competency to stand trial—the defendant must have a "rational and factual understanding" of the nature of the proceedings, and must be able to rationally assist his lawyer in defending him.