Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
To Have or to Be? is a 1976 book by psychoanalyst Erich Fromm, in which he differentiates between having and being. It was originally published in the World Perspectives book series edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen for Harper & Row publishing firm. Fromm writes that modern society has become materialistic and prefers "having" to
Erich Fromm was born on March 23, 1900, at Frankfurt am Main, the only child of Orthodox Jewish parents, Rosa (Krause) and Naphtali Fromm. [5] He started his academic studies in 1918 at the University of Frankfurt am Main with two semesters of jurisprudence .
German-American psychoanalyst Erich Fromm was influenced by Freudian ideologies when coming up with the theory of character orientation. The basis of character orientation comes from Freud who said that character traits underlie behavior and that they must be inferred from it. [3]
The authoritarian personality is a personality type characterized by a disposition to treat authority figures with unquestioning obedience and respect.Conceptually, the term authoritarian personality originated from the writings of Erich Fromm, and usually is applied to people who exhibit a strict and oppressive personality towards their subordinates. [1]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
According to Fromm, the concept integrates Marx's theory concerning how the mode of production determines ideology with Freud's concept of character. [ 2 ] While individual character describes the richness of the character structure of an individual, the social character describes the emotional attitudes common to people in a social class or ...
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Erich Fromm proposed a very different definition of authenticity in the mid-twentieth century. [14] He considered behavior of any kind, even that wholly in accord with societal mores , to be authentic if it results from personal understanding and approval of its drives and origins, rather than merely from conformity with the received wisdom of ...