Ads
related to: chimel v california warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Criminal Warrant Check
Quickly Find County Warrants
Search Yourself Or Someone Else
- Search Warrants By Name
People May Have A Criminal Past
Check For Active Warrants Today
- Search Past Warrants
Check For Any Outstanding Warrants
Find Public County Warrant Records
- Check Active Warrants
Quickly Find County Warrants
For You Or Someone Else. Search Now
- Criminal Warrant Check
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797 (1971) was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled against the retroactive application of Chimel v. California.The Court also ruled that evidence from mistaken identity arrests can be admissible as long as other factors support probable cause.
The search warrant explicitly stated that without Cardenas' consent, a body cavity search could be conducted only after X-ray confirmation of a suspected foreign object within her.
In Chimel v.California (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that if the police arrest someone, they may search the body of the person without a warrant and "the area into which he might reach" in order to protect material evidence or the officers' safety. [7]
Wracked by violence related to drug trafficking, Mexico is one of the world's most dangerous countries for journalists, news advocacy groups say.. Reporters Without Borders says more than 150 ...
This game promises to be a good one as the brothers battle for bragging rights and playoff position in the AFC. L.A.'s defense remains a quality unit, but the matchup warrants leaving them on the ...
Citing Chimel v. California, Justice Stewart reasoned that the search of Murphy's person was justified under an exception to the warrant requirement, the search incident to arrest. The basis for that exception is that when an arrest is made, the arrestee may attempt use any weapons he has and/or attempt to destroy any incriminating evidence in ...
Ads
related to: chimel v california warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month