Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case Rhode v. Bonta, originally Rhode v. Becerra, is challenging Proposition 63's requirement for background checks to purchase ammunition as well as its prohibition against importation of ammunition into the state by residents, unless importation takes place through a licensed ammunition dealer.
In Rhode v. Becerra, Benitez issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of California's 2016 Proposition 63 law requiring background checks for ammunition sales, ruling in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association; he deemed the law "constitutionally defective." [16] [17] The Ninth Circuit stayed Benitez's ruling pending ...
In Duncan v. Becerra and Rhode v. Becerra, he struck down portions of 2016 California Proposition 63 that prohibited possession of high-capacity magazines and required background checks for ammunition purchases, respectively. The state appealed both decisions; [7] the ruling in Duncan v. Bonta was reversed by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
This marks the judge’s second time with the case, Miller v. Bonta. He previously struck down the state’s ban on assault weapons in 2021. ... California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
California Proposition 63 may refer to: California Proposition 63 (1986) - Official State Language. Initiative Constitutional Amendment; California Proposition 63 (2004) - California Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) California Proposition 63 (2016) - Firearms and Ammunition Sales
California law has required the DOJ to maintain records of handgun sales in California since the 1950s, Bonta noted in the news release about the court decision. Legislators recently added sales ...