enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    The Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). [2] The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant. [3]

  3. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    Seven states (Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, New Mexico, Ohio, and Vermont) explicitly impose a criminal penalty for noncompliance with the obligation to identify oneself. Maryland requires a person to respond to identification request if the person is wearing, carrying (open or concealed), or transporting a handgun.

  4. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    If the defendant objects to the excision of parts of a document, the full text of the document must be preserved on the record for purposes of appeal. [99] Notes prepared by law enforcement agents of an interview with a potential government witness may be subject to production under the Jencks Act, provided the witness testifies at the trial.

  5. Brady v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).

  6. Giglio v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giglio_v._United_States

    Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]

  7. Witnesses in Trump documents case can remain private, judge rules

    www.aol.com/news/witnesses-trump-documents-case...

    Witnesses for now will be referenced in court papers using pseudonyms, the judge said. Trump has repeatedly attacked judges, prosecutors and some known witnesses in the four criminal cases against ...

  8. Civil discovery under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_discovery_under...

    Section 15 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided: [A]ll the said courts of the United States, shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the ...

  9. Silent witness rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_witness_rule

    The silent witness rule is the use of "substitutions" when referring to sensitive information in the United States open courtroom jury trial system. An example of a substitution method is the use of code-words on a "key card", to which witnesses and the jury would refer during the trial, but which the public would not have access to.