Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
So, 6 is a perfect number because the proper divisors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. [2] [4] Euclid proved c. 300 BCE that every prime expressed as M p = 2 p − 1 has a corresponding perfect number M p × (M p +1)/2 = 2 p − 1 × (2 p − 1). For example, the Mersenne prime 2 2 − 1 = 3 leads to the corresponding perfect number 2 2 ...
For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number. The next perfect number is 28, since 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28. The first four perfect numbers are 6, 28, 496 and 8128. [2] The sum of proper divisors of a number is called its aliquot sum, so a perfect number is one that is equal to its aliquot sum.
This means that there should on average be about ≈ 5.92 primes p of a given number of decimal digits such that is prime. The conjecture is fairly accurate for the first 40 Mersenne primes, but between 2 20,000,000 and 2 85,000,000 there are at least 12, [ 8 ] rather than the expected number which is around 3.7.
A number that has the same number of digits as the number of digits in its prime factorization, including exponents but excluding exponents equal to 1. A046758: Extravagant numbers: 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 38, ... A number that has fewer digits than the number of digits in its prime factorization (including ...
When a triple of numbers a, b and c forms a primitive Pythagorean triple, then (c minus the even leg) and one-half of (c minus the odd leg) are both perfect squares; however this is not a sufficient condition, as the numbers {1, 8, 9} pass the perfect squares test but are not a Pythagorean triple since 1 2 + 8 2 ≠ 9 2. At most one of a, b, c ...
In number theory, a narcissistic number [1] [2] (also known as a pluperfect digital invariant (PPDI), [3] an Armstrong number [4] (after Michael F. Armstrong) [5] or a plus perfect number) [6] in a given number base is a number that is the sum of its own digits each raised to the power of the number of digits.
For example, we can determine whether a given integer is a perfect number, (sequence A000396 in the OEIS), even though we do not have a formula for the nth perfect number. Computable and definable sequences
In 1996, Andrew Granville proposed the following construction of a set: [1] Let , and for any integer larger than 1, let if , <,. A Granville number is an element of for which equality holds, that is, is a Granville number if it is equal to the sum of its proper divisors that are also in .