Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Expeditionary Contracting Command was a major subordinate command of the U.S. Army Contracting Command headquartered at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama.The one-star command was organized to accomplish its global operational missions through its nine Contracting Support Brigades, seventeen Contingency Contracting Battalions, sixteen Senior Contingency Contracting Teams, and ninety-two Contingency ...
As a result, ENIAC wasn't finished until November 1945, three months after the end of the war. [19] Throughout the course of ENIAC's construction, nine additional supplements were made to the initial contract, increasing Project PX's overall cost to $486,800. [6] The right side of ENIAC as seen from the center of the machine.
ENIAC's design and construction was financed by the United States Army, Ordnance Corps, Research and Development Command, led by Major General Gladeon M. Barnes.The total cost was about $487,000, equivalent to $6,900,000 in 2023. [14]
Writers of a SOW often include requirements that belong in other parts of a contract. Specifically, quantitative technical requirements are addressed in the military specification and work requirements are specified in the SOW, and data requirements (e.g., delivery, format, and content) should be in the CDRL along with the appropriate DID to minimize the potential for conflict.
Remington Rand ranked 66th among United States corporations in the value of World War II military production contracts. [ 8 ] In 1950, Remington Rand acquired the Eckert–Mauchly Computer Corporation , founded by the makers of the ENIAC , and in 1952, they acquired Engineering Research Associates (ERA), both of which were pioneers in ...
Data requirements can also be identified in the contract via special contract clauses (e.g., DFARS), which define special data provisions such as rights in data, warranty, etc. SOW guidance of MIL-HDBK-245D describes the desired relationship: "Work requirements should be specified in the SOW, and all data requirements for delivery, format, and ...
MIL-STD-498 standard describes the development and documentation in terms of 22 Data Item Descriptions (DIDs), which were standardized documents for recording the results of each the development and support processes, for example, the Software Design Description DID was the standard format for the results of the software design process.
[[Category:United States Army templates]] to the <includeonly> section at the bottom of that page. Otherwise, add <noinclude>[[Category:United States Army templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character.