Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Toyota Cressida sedan (MX73; Australia) In 1984 for the 1985 model year, a new Cressida was introduced by Toyota. This was the MX73 (MX72 for wagon). The 5M-E engine was mostly unchanged from the 1984 model year but gained a knock-sensor, which detected pre-ignition and adjusted timing accordingly when a lower-grade fuel was used.
1985–1991 Toyota Chaser; 1979–1994 Toyota Cressida; MX model code (3M, 4M, 5M, 7M engine) 1981.5-1989 Toyota Cresta; 1988–1989.5 Toyota Chaser; 1982–1992.5 Toyota Cressida; GRX model code (2GR, 4GR V6) 2005–2019 Toyota Mark X [3] [4] JZX model code (1JZ, 2JZ engine) 1991.5-2005 Toyota Mark II; 1990–2001 Toyota Chaser; 1990–1994 ...
Full-size body-on-frame SUV. The oldest continuing Toyota nameplate. The J70 is an off-road oriented model produced with minimal changes since 1984. Land Cruiser 300: J300: 2021 Global (except Europe and North America) Land Cruiser Prado/250: 1984 J250: 2023 Global Mid-size body-on-frame SUV, smaller than the full-size Land Cruiser. Sequoia ...
The final Toyota Cressida might be the best version of this one-time flagship but also the least well-remembered. It arrived in late 1988, still as visually conservative as a Brooks Brothers suit ...
It was launched in 1980 and shared the chassis with the Mark II/Cressida and Chaser and was the top-level car at Japanese dealership Toyota Vista Store. The Cresta was produced for five generations, and production stopped in 2001 when it was merged with the Chaser to form the short-lived Verossa. The goal of the Cresta was to offer a more ...
The Toyota 7M-GE introduced in the early months of 1986 is a 2,954 cc (3.0 L) 24-valve (4 valves per cylinder) DOHC/fuel-injected engine. The valves are spaced at a performance-oriented 50° angle. The valves are spaced at a performance-oriented 50° angle.
Toyota_Cressida_(MX83),_white.jpg (760 × 562 pixels, file size: 82 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons . Information from its description page there is shown below.
One objective of a good design review is to examine the results of validation testing, making all product weaknesses visible. This examination involves applying another GD 3 concept, design review based on test results (DRBTR). When applying DRBTR, we must, wherever possible, observe the product test before, during and after completion.