Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The longest alternating subsequence problem has also been studied in the setting of online algorithms, in which the elements of are presented in an online fashion, and a decision maker needs to decide whether to include or exclude each element at the time it is first presented, without any knowledge of the elements that will be presented in the future, and without the possibility of recalling ...
The problem of computing a longest common subsequence has been well studied in computer science. It can be solved in polynomial time by dynamic programming ; [ 5 ] this basic algorithm has additional speedups for small alphabets (the Method of Four Russians ), [ 6 ] for strings with few differences, [ 7 ] for strings with few matching pairs of ...
The longest increasing subsequences are studied in the context of various disciplines related to mathematics, including algorithmics, random matrix theory, representation theory, and physics. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The longest increasing subsequence problem is solvable in time O ( n log n ) , {\displaystyle O(n\log n),} where n {\displaystyle n ...
The above algorithm has worst-case time and space complexities of O(mn) (see big O notation), where m is the number of elements in sequence A and n is the number of elements in sequence B. The Hunt–Szymanski algorithm modifies this algorithm to have a worst-case time complexity of O ( mn log m ) and space complexity of O ( mn ) , though it ...
Comparison of two revisions of an example file, based on their longest common subsequence (black) A longest common subsequence (LCS) is the longest subsequence common to all sequences in a set of sequences (often just two sequences).
The number of piles is the length of a longest subsequence. Whenever a card is placed on top of a pile, put a back-pointer to the top card in the previous pile (that, by assumption, has a lower value than the new card has).
For example, for the array of values [−2, 1, −3, 4, −1, 2, 1, −5, 4], the contiguous subarray with the largest sum is [4, −1, 2, 1], with sum 6. Some properties of this problem are: If the array contains all non-negative numbers, then the problem is trivial; a maximum subarray is the entire array.
The zeros of the eta function include all the zeros of the zeta function: the negative even integers (real equidistant simple zeros); the zeros along the critical line, none of which are known to be multiple and over 40% of which have been proven to be simple, and the hypothetical zeros in the critical strip but not on the critical line, which if they do exist must occur at the vertices of ...