Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Graphs of functions commonly used in the analysis of algorithms, showing the number of operations versus input size for each function. The following tables list the computational complexity of various algorithms for common mathematical operations.
The definition of matrix multiplication is that if C = AB for an n × m matrix A and an m × p matrix B, then C is an n × p matrix with entries = =. From this, a simple algorithm can be constructed which loops over the indices i from 1 through n and j from 1 through p, computing the above using a nested loop:
In arbitrary-precision arithmetic, it is common to use long multiplication with the base set to 2 w, where w is the number of bits in a word, for multiplying relatively small numbers. To multiply two numbers with n digits using this method, one needs about n 2 operations.
The optimal number of field operations needed to multiply two square n × n matrices up to constant factors is still unknown. This is a major open question in theoretical computer science. As of January 2024, the best bound on the asymptotic complexity of a matrix multiplication algorithm is O(n 2.371339). [2]
This reduces the number of matrix additions and subtractions from 18 to 15. The number of matrix multiplications is still 7, and the asymptotic complexity is the same. [6] The algorithm was further optimised in 2017, [7] reducing the number of matrix additions per step to 12 while maintaining the number of matrix multiplications, and again in ...
In general, for a vector space V over a field F, a bilinear form on V is the same as a bilinear map V × V → F. If V is a vector space with dual space V ∗, then the canonical evaluation map, b(f, v) = f(v) is a bilinear map from V ∗ × V to the base field. Let V and W be vector spaces over the same base field F.
For example, when computing x 2 k −1, the binary method requires k−1 multiplications and k−1 squarings. However, one could perform k squarings to get x 2 k and then multiply by x −1 to obtain x 2 k −1. To this end we define the signed-digit representation of an integer n in radix b as
For example, to multiply 7 and 15 modulo 17 in Montgomery form, again with R = 100, compute the product of 3 and 4 to get 12 as above. The extended Euclidean algorithm implies that 8⋅100 − 47⋅17 = 1, so R′ = 8. Multiply 12 by 8 to get 96 and reduce modulo 17 to get 11. This is the Montgomery form of 3, as expected.